fidesquaerens (marta_bee) wrote,
fidesquaerens
marta_bee

on John/Sherlock and Sherlock/Molly: sometimes you just have to giggle

Earlier today, I saw two different versions of this meme:

Something about this particular meme always puts me on edge. It’s the passive-aggressive line of the “So sue me” bit, I think, along with the mean-spirited comments that people seem to put in their own comments when they describe it, usually either attacking the intelligence or the respect for canon of people who prefer a bit of Johnlock. The picture itself gets associated with that feeling of being attacked after a while, I think. Today I saw it twice, as I said. The first was the normal slam: that two men could share a flat without it being romantic, why couldn’t people see the true value of deep friendship, etc. That left me as frustrating as this picture ever does. But the second? It wanted a Sherlock/Molly wedding because that would make the poster very happy.

At which point I started giggling like a giggling thing. The juxtaposition was just too much.

For the uninitiated: Fans of the BBC Sherlock show seem pretty well divided into different subgroups by our “ships,” which are the characters we typically like to imagine being in romantic relationships with. It’s kind of like being an Elvis or Pat Boone fan back in the day. The biggest one by a long shot is Johnlock (John and Sherlock), and it’s so influential that a lot of people who don’t imagine them together feel the need to make that fact plain. Some people view Sherlock as asexual, not interested in romance at all, but with fans of the BBC series, it seems much more common to say Sherlock and John are just friends because Sherlock’s true luv is someone else entirely. Almost always a woman; usually Molly Hooper, the lab pathologist he rubs elbows with quite often at St. Bart’s. (She’s an addition to the Doyle canon, but a much-needed one in my opinion.)

Let’s get it out of the way: Molly Hooper, quite simply, is awesome. [Language warning] This is the woman who saw Sherlock whip a corpse and asked him out. She dumped the world’s only consulting criminal and faked the death of a man whose best friend is a doctor trained in trauma and whose brother is the British government. I have nothing but love and respect for Molly Hooper’s strength and intelligence.

(If you’re looking for an explanation in fic form of just why Molly Hooper is so far beyond awesome, you really should read The Mourning Woman by M_Leigh. It’s fairly short, G-rated, and one of the best character studies I’ve read in a long time.)

And really, if someone wants to pair her off with Sherlock, my response isn’t going to be to wrinkle my nose and question whether you’ve properly understood the characters, much less why you think every woman who crosses Sherlock’s path has to be a romantic interest. (I could; of the female characters in Sherlock, the only two who aren’t often interpreted as head-over-heels for him is Mrs. Hudson.) Rather, I’ll probably say: “Convince me.” It’s the same approach I took with Tolkien-based fic. I could never imagine Legolas and Arwen as an item, or Aragorn and Finduilas – until someone made it work wonderfully for me. And Molly has more than enough redeeming qualities that she’s every inch Sherlock’s intellectual equal. Emotionally, she has a history of being a bit of a pushover and I prefer her as Sherlock’s friend rather than his romantic partner, but I’m also very convinceable on this point.

Personally, I’m a bit of a Johnlock shipper within the BBC verse and prefer to think of him as asexual in the context of the Doyle stories. Like the second meme-sharer who wanted a Sherlock/Molly wedding, it’s not because I think either approach is necessarily wrong; it’s because imagining them making a life together makes me happy. I don’t even necessarily need it to be romantic, much less sexual; it’s just that I get more of that sense of longevity and devotion in the stories that work this as a romantic relationship. So many Johnlock stories live right on the line between deep friendship and romance anyway; quite a few look at the difference between the two types of love as a theme and ask when exacty that line was crossed, if it exists at all. Stories about Sherlock and John in some degree of romantic love simply seem to do a better job of honoring the fact that, at this point in their lives, this is the most important relationship for both Sherlock and John. “I was so alone, and you gave me so much,” indeed.

(Spoilers for series three from this point on, from what I’ve gleaned from the trailers and publicity photos.)

It seems that in series three, things are going to shake up a bit for John and Sherlock. We know that Martin Freeman’s long-term partner has been cast as Mary Morstan, the woman Watson marries in the Doyle books. (One of them…) We know that episode two will center around a wedding – that was the clue word Moffat gave us – and that most likely it it will be John and Mary. Incidentally, Amanda Abbington deserves all the praise I can heap on her. She’s a fantastic actress in her own right. She is on Tumblr, which is the very depths of Sherlock fandom craziness. And she gives as good as she gets:

More than that, she kind of likes us:

and she has a fashion sense that I can only describe as able to go tit-for-tat against Benedict’s when he picks out his own clothes:

I love her. I love the bits we’ve seen of her in the trailer as Mary. I love her spunk, and she is quite obviously a wonderful support and complement to Martin Freeman. I hate the threats she apparently received from fans who like imagining John and Sherlock as a romantic thing. I have some definite thoughts on the comments that seem to have touched that whole incident off, and while I disagree with some comments both she and Martin Freeman have made in a big way, that doesn’t change how over the line those threats were.

Here’s the thing, though. The upcoming wedding in series three will almost certainly be between those two. Pictures suggest Sherlock will be the best man. And while Molly seems to have an engagement ring on in some of the recently-released pictures</a>, it’s most likely an engagement to this dude rather than to Sherlock.

I don’t have a thing against the world who want to imagine Sherlock and Molly having a romance, perhaps even getting married some day. I’d ask that they convince me of it (which is doable but needs doing). But to think that this wedding will actually be between the two of them is a fan’s happy imaginings. It’s not disproved by what we know about the show, but it’s not supported by it either. There are hints that the show might be going that direction, but there are also hints – more of them IMO – that could be used to support the idea that John and Sherlock are more than just very good friends. For example:

(How many male best friends notice their BFF’s wardrobe and cheekbones, honestly?)

It’s called subtext. It’s there to play with, it’s fun to play with. I love to imagine Sherlock and John growing old together and retiring to raise bees outside of London, and even if that isn’t the direction the show ultimately goes in, that doesn’t change the fact that th John and Sherlock I imagine growing old together are the ones given life through this show, supplemented by my own imagination where the show-writers are silent.

Kind of like people who want to see Sherlock and Molly get married… are doing the exact same thing.

What irks me is that, while both relationships may never be portrayed in the show (which is fine), one of those will get written off as ludicrous and unimaginable and about a completely different show than the one Freeman and Cumberbatch are putting out. (Hint: it doesn’t involve ex-army-doctors) And as John would put it, that’s a bit not good. More than a bit.

Okay, off to see Hobbit. I may write tomorrow about the subtext I see for Sherlock/Molly and John/Sherlock in the show, the scenes that make me think that’s a workable interpretation, if anyone’s interested.

Originally published at Faith Seeking Understanding. You can comment here or there.

Tags: fannish
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 4 comments