?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

electoral college madness

There's this viral video going around, looking at what would happen if there's a tie in the electoral college voting, or even if one candidate or the other fails to get to 270 votes for some reason, like if a Third Party won some of the votes.



The solution: the House chooses one of the candidates, with one vote going to each state. The video points out how absurd this is because of the difference in populations between, say, New York state and Connecticut. Because I'm curious like this, I wondered just how small a proportion of Americans might be represented in such a vote. So using this list of state populations, I added up states with populations #24-50. They represent just 17.64% of the population.

Also, keep in mind that this doesn't mean 17.64% of the population would be represented in such a vote. State political races are as close as everything else. Let's be extremely generous and say that 60% of the residents in each of these states actually voted for their candidates. That means that in the case of a tie, our president could be chosen by people who were voted for 10.584% of the poulation. And that's of the people who showed up and actually voted, often in off-year races when there's a much lower voter turnout.

So here I am, racking my head trying to decide who I'm going to vote for. (Obama? Jill Stein? Write-in? etc.) I knew that my vote counted exactly the same as people who didn't study up on the candidates and issues. I'm a NY liberal so my vote was likely going to be an empty gesture anyway. Can anyone imagine Obama not winning my state, whatever way I vote? But idiosyncrasies like this just make the whole election seem even more arbitrary than it actually is. And that makes it next to impossible to feel like my government actually represents me. How am I supposed to have confidence in the important work it's supposed to do?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHEDXzOfENI

Tags:

Comments

( 2 comments — Leave a comment )
dreamflower02
Oct. 14th, 2012 02:44 pm (UTC)
The electoral college is out-of-date. It served a purpose when communications were confined to how quickly news could be carried by a man on horseback. In these days of instant communications it seems laughable that we still rely on such an outdated mode of choosing a leader.

I wish we could dump the system for direct vote. I think for one thing, it would raise the numbers of actual voters considerably if they knew their vote actually *counted* for something!
engarian
Oct. 14th, 2012 09:21 pm (UTC)
And that makes it next to impossible to feel like my government actually represents me.

And that is precisely the problem with the current system. It doesn't represent the people, yet they attempt to do so, thus satisfying no-one.

- Erulisse (one L)
( 2 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

marta_bee
fidesquaerens
Website

Latest Month

October 2019
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow